Telecom expenses are often accepted as fixed overhead—until a detailed review reveals how much waste is hiding in plain sight. This case study follows a mid-sized logistics firm that successfully reduced its telecom spend by 35% in just six months through strategic audits, vendor renegotiations, inventory management, and smarter payment methods.
For companies managing multiple locations and mobile fleets, this example highlights practical, repeatable steps to drive down costs without sacrificing performance.
Background: A Growing Communications Footprint
The company had expanded rapidly over three years, opening five new locations and onboarding over 200 mobile devices across operations and field teams. Their communications setup included:
- Verizon and AT&T mobile lines
- A legacy PBX phone system at headquarters
- Multiple VoIP services across regional offices
- Separate internet providers for each location
While the infrastructure supported their growth, there was no centralized management of telecom assets, usage, or vendor contracts.
The Problem: Redundant Services and Unused Lines
Upon reviewing monthly telecom spend, the finance team noticed costs climbing consistently—despite no recent changes in team size or service plans. A cross-functional audit revealed:
- Over 30 inactive mobile lines still being billed
- VoIP users assigned premium licenses they didn’t need
- Contracts nearing auto-renewal with rate hikes
- Internet services with overlapping bandwidth at two sites
Without a telecom inventory or contract tracking system, these inefficiencies had gone unnoticed for months.
Step 1: Building a Telecom Inventory
The team began by using an Excel-based template to catalog every mobile line, VoIP user, and internet service. They pulled billing records from Verizon Business and AT&T Business, then cross-referenced usage with active employees.
This exercise alone uncovered $5,400/month in unnecessary mobile and VoIP charges.
Step 2: Renegotiating Vendor Contracts
The company reached out to their providers to renegotiate outdated contracts. With usage data in hand, they successfully:
- Lowered mobile plan rates by switching to pooled data
- Reduced VoIP licensing costs by downgrading unused premium features
- Secured a 12% discount on internet service by bundling locations under a single vendor.
Step 3: Centralizing Billing and Cost Allocation
Telecom costs were centralized under the finance department and allocated monthly by department. This improved accountability and created a structure for proactive reviews.
They also set reminders for contract expiration dates to avoid auto-renewal surprises going forward.
Step 4: Earning Cashback on Recurring Payments
Beyond direct cost-cutting, the company introduced a new tactic: using cashback tools to save on recurring telecom payments. By purchasing digital gift cards, they were able to earn cashback with a Verizon gift card and get rewards with an AT&T gift card when paying their monthly bills.
They used Fluz to buy cards for the exact amount due, applying them immediately through their online business portals. Over six months, this strategy yielded an additional $1,200 in cashback—without changing vendors or plans.
The Results: 35% Cost Reduction in 6 Months
Through a combination of audits, renegotiations, inventory cleanup, and cashback optimization, the company cut telecom costs by 35%. These savings allowed them to reinvest in faster internet connections and upgrade cybersecurity tools for their VoIP systems.
Takeaways for Other Businesses
- Maintain a centralized inventory of telecom assets and users
- Review usage regularly to downgrade or cancel inactive lines
- Renegotiate contracts annually with usage data in hand
- Automate billing oversight to prevent long-term waste
- Use cashback platforms like Fluz to passively offset recurring expenses
Final Thoughts
This case study shows that telecom savings aren’t limited to one-off audits—they come from building habits, improving visibility, and using every available tool, including cashback. With the right structure in place, telecom becomes a controllable cost—not a growing burden.



